Michigan Democratic Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed ignited controversy on social media after comparing Sharia law to Christian canon law during an interview with Fox News anchor Jesse Watters. When Watters questioned El-Sayed’s past opposition to a ban on Sharia law, characterizing such efforts as akin to White supremacy, El-Sayed responded by drawing a parallel between Sharia, which is based on Islamic religious texts, and Catholic Church law, emphasizing the principle of religious freedom in America.

The comparison elicited strong backlash from social media users, particularly Christians and conservatives, who highlighted perceived differences between the two legal systems. Critics argued that El-Sayed’s equivalency was misleading, asserting that while canon law is limited to spiritual matters within the Church and grants significant autonomy to the state, Sharia law is far more comprehensive, historically governing all aspects of life and, according to some Islamic clerics, dictating state affairs. Commentators labeled Sharia law as incompatible with Western civilization and accused El-Sayed of evading scrutiny of Islam by playing the victim card. The reaction was swift and harsh, with some predicting the end of El-Sayed’s political prospects.

Source: El-Sayed’s defense of Sharia law stance sparks online eruption from Christians, conservatives: ‘He’s done’

This is a summary. Read the original at yahoo.com.